<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Zacapa Centenario 23-Year-Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/</link>
	<description>A blog reviewing rums, and things about rum. It delves into tiki drinks, rum comparisons, drink comparisons, and other stuff centering around rum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Steeves</title>
		<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Steeves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I definitely agree that Zacapa used to taste different. Change is not always better, and rarely for the consumer.

I&#039;d love to read the article(s) about Zacapa&#039;s solera system and the true average ages. In all my research I found very little information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree that Zacapa used to taste different. Change is not always better, and rarely for the consumer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to read the article(s) about Zacapa&#8217;s solera system and the true average ages. In all my research I found very little information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominikschachtsiek</title>
		<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dominikschachtsiek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess, that there are quite some misconception about the subject here...

Ron Zacapa was never really 23 years old - I definitely had the feeling, that 10 years ago, before the whole hype it taste different. However it is still damn good - and I am calling it still one of the best rums of the world.
And if it comes to say a bad word about Zacapa, it will be, that they still hold on their stupid age statement.

Actually Ron Zacapa systema solera 23 is around 6 years old. There is a XO [which will be 8 years old or what they say 25 solera] - but the aromas are much more muted and one dimensional [though it is even smoother] - I would always go for the 23.
The uniqueness comes from the use of different barrels [reused but untreated bourbon, charred bourbon, manzanilla sherry and P.X. sherry] and that the rum is transported from the lowlands to the highlands after it is distilled and for bottling back to the lowlands. I guess it is this extra agitation, which makes it so outstanding.

By the way - the guys at Ron Zacapa dosn&#039;t even have an authentic &quot;solera&quot; - this is very confusing and like said: sad to use it anyway. I think, that you should let the product talk - not the marketing department.

One more time - the product itself is outstanding - but nowadays, there are definitely some equally good options, which I haven&#039;t seen in the market, when Zacapa started its triumph...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, that there are quite some misconception about the subject here&#8230;</p>
<p>Ron Zacapa was never really 23 years old &#8211; I definitely had the feeling, that 10 years ago, before the whole hype it taste different. However it is still damn good &#8211; and I am calling it still one of the best rums of the world.<br />
And if it comes to say a bad word about Zacapa, it will be, that they still hold on their stupid age statement.</p>
<p>Actually Ron Zacapa systema solera 23 is around 6 years old. There is a XO [which will be 8 years old or what they say 25 solera] &#8211; but the aromas are much more muted and one dimensional [though it is even smoother] &#8211; I would always go for the 23.<br />
The uniqueness comes from the use of different barrels [reused but untreated bourbon, charred bourbon, manzanilla sherry and P.X. sherry] and that the rum is transported from the lowlands to the highlands after it is distilled and for bottling back to the lowlands. I guess it is this extra agitation, which makes it so outstanding.</p>
<p>By the way &#8211; the guys at Ron Zacapa dosn&#8217;t even have an authentic &#8220;solera&#8221; &#8211; this is very confusing and like said: sad to use it anyway. I think, that you should let the product talk &#8211; not the marketing department.</p>
<p>One more time &#8211; the product itself is outstanding &#8211; but nowadays, there are definitely some equally good options, which I haven&#8217;t seen in the market, when Zacapa started its triumph&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Steeves</title>
		<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Steeves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vizcaya or one of the older Flor De Cana rums might, like the 12-year-old, work for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vizcaya or one of the older Flor De Cana rums might, like the 12-year-old, work for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John MIner</title>
		<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John MIner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-3585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I favor a drier flavor and preferably without added sweetening.  Which would you recommend?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I favor a drier flavor and preferably without added sweetening.  Which would you recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottesrum.com/2007/06/26/ron-zacapa-centenario-23-year-old/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zacapa 23 years old used to be when I bought it a few years ago! dont be fooled the new stuff is a blend and not what the old bottles were.  Not even close to the same quality.   Find the real 23 Year old and you will have a winner.   the blend of up to 23 yo and some 6 years is a scam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zacapa 23 years old used to be when I bought it a few years ago! dont be fooled the new stuff is a blend and not what the old bottles were.  Not even close to the same quality.   Find the real 23 Year old and you will have a winner.   the blend of up to 23 yo and some 6 years is a scam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

